Showing posts with label ian fleming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ian fleming. Show all posts

Friday, October 29, 2010

More thoughts on Bond.

For most of my young life I was a chronic hero-worshiper. I have been half-heartedly trying to determine if I was excessive in this and if I am still prone to it. Naturally, my heroes these days are more diverse. But when I was young they were fairly common and shared a number of traits in that they were all strong, erudite and principled men. These days, I number my mother, my wife and my children among my heroes, as well as men and women that are very simple in their heroism in that they don't conquer worlds so much as behave with consistent kindness, love and endurance.

I've written about this in the past but when I was a teenager I was madly in love with the idea of James Bond. As I said, I wanted to be like Bond - except for the womanizing part; I wanted to be admired by women and have relationships with a woman but not prolific in my use of them the way Bond was. Maybe it's because I've been making a lot of "your 15 favorite" lists on Facebook but I thought I'd dash off a few more thoughts about what for me was an important influence and what remains a beloved literary figure.

The Bond novels are all delightful and present a more complete and complex picture of the cardboard god the movies have made him out to be. If you're only going to read one Bond novel to get a feel for these works I'd have a hard time narrowing it down. My finalists would include You Only Live Twice because it captures almost everything one loves about them - the sense of getting inside the foreign and exotic that Fleming brought so naturally to the setting, the sex, martial arts and gunplay, the bizarre (perennial bad guy Ernst Stavro Blofeld is in his element here as a reimagined Japanese warlord on a private volcanic island of poisonous flowers) and the tender (the novel's coda in the fishing village is Fleming reaching beyond pulp into artistry). I'd also have to consider On Her Majesty's Secret Service for the same reasons and the depth it brings to Bond through his association with the woman he would actually marry, Tracy (she's gunned down shortly after) and The Man With the Golden Gun because it is a tight, well characterized tough guy novel with Fleming;s gift for characterization and character background amply displayed. I'd also have to throw in From Russia, With Love for its cleverness (Fleming unfolds the tale with multiple perspectives, Bond's but also the Soviets and the femme fatale, Tatiana Romanova).

But for the movies, for my favorite, I'd settle quite comfortably on the film version of From Russia, With Love. I must have watched this on VHS a hundred times when I was a kid, always consciously (and hopelessly) copying Sean Connery's stride and attitude. I had an enormous crush on Daniella Bianchi, who played Tatiana. Most people when they pick a favorite Bond film quickly realize the Connery years were among the best and zero in on Goldfinger because it was seamless and nearly perfect as a Bond movie - and with good reason. But I'll take the ambiance and darkness of From Russia over the slickness of Goldfinger any day - I think without From Russia, With Love, there'd be no Portishead (no doubt this band also loved the Len Deighton novels and movies and more, too, but you get my point).

The Moore years were wasted ones and the years that turned the Bond movie franchise into a ridiculous mess, although my attitude toward Moore has softened - he recognized the Bond silliness for what it was and played it for laughs, appropriately; they become clever self satires in his capable hands. But the other Bond movie I liked and watched a lot as a teenager was The Living Daylights. For one brief moment there the movies looked like the novels. Everything about Timothy Dalton, Maryam D'Abo, the setting, the soundtrack (The Pretenders!!) was right.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Picking Them Off

Even though I devoured Ian Fleming's Bond books, I never was much for spy novels. I'm discovering them now with great delight. Naturally, I have my preferences - I haven't read a Bourne novel but I don't think I would like them. No, Ashenden showed me the way. Then I tracked down Eric Ambler. Rediscovered LeCarre - have since read the amazing Tailor, Tinker, Soldier, Spy. Richard Condon's Manchurian Candidate blew me away. Now am hip deep in The Miernik Dossier and loving it.

Next - Len Deighton? Everything I need to know to get started is here.

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Spending some time with James Bond.

By Charlie Kondek

My Uncle Frank recently gave me a copy of The Best of James Bond 30th Anniversary collection, a CD with all the theme music from the James Bond movies, from the main Monty Norman theme to License to Kill. I had the earlier version of this record (and others) on cassette when I was growing up and listened to it frequently because I was a huge James Bond fan, and hearing this music again gave me all kinds of good feelings. Of course, I know all the songs (and what songs - the strings, the horns), but it brought back that time in my life vividly.

The James Bond novels and movies were very important to me as a teenager. I'm sure they were and are important to a lot of people. James Bond is such an obvious role model for young men and simply entertaining. In recent years I have come to describe the phenomenon to myself as just this: James Bond thrillers are not great spy novels, they are pulp novels of the most basic kind - good guy defeats bad guy and gets girl(s) - and the reason they have endured is because they simply struck a right chord at the right times, first as Cold War-era novels and then as a movie franchise that spanned decades. Like all great series characters, Bond is both general and specific. General: he is strong and tough and sexy. Specific: the cars, the gambling, the smokes, the booze. Put him up against the world's great series characters, especially from similar genre (spies, private eyes, swashbucklers) and I think you'll come up with that same set of general and specific. Think Sherlock Holmes.

I find this hard to talk about without getting too personal but James Bond was important to me because I always was a hero worshiper, an admirer and an emulator. I wanted to be like Bond very badly, although different in my own ways. I wanted to be confident and strong, erudite. I did not particularly want to be a womanizer although of course I wanted attention from women. Bond was, for me, part of a pantheon of heroes that included Philip Marlowe and Indiana Jones and Bruce Lee and Humphrey Bogart. I have since outgrown these heroes, most of my heroes these days being people I know (and, oddly, women!) but like tangible treasures, they are always tucked away in a special cedar box in my heart.

Some final (for now) and random thoughts on Bond. I tuned out to the movies while Pierce Brosnan was still playing the role. Just not interested. In fact, I only like the pre-Roger Moore movies, especially my favorite, From Russia, With Love. And by the way, I don't have anything against Moore, I just prefer that era for the films. I love the Fleming novels, and now that I re-read them in my middle thirties find that they are not great writing as a whole, although there are moments where they are great. The movies departed from the novels in that the novels were really about character and plot, even if the characters were at times a little shallow or caricature-ish and the plots ridiculous. The movies are about bigger, faster chases with bigger, faster explosions and an endless parade of interchangeable women. I am not interested in them unless Paul Schrader or somebody takes them over and puts the emphasis back on plot and characterization.

The Bond novels that I find myself re-reading include: From Russia, With Love, Dr. No, Goldfinger, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, You Only Live Twice and The Man With the Golden Gun. By the way, the album shown here is one I have on vinyl and wore out needles on as a kid. I got the image at this fine blog.